Here
we are, well into the fall season. In Plano, Texas, temperatures
are dropping, and so are the revenues, profits, and market
valuation of the towns most prominent corporate citizen,
Electronic Data Systems.
EDS, the company that trail-blazed the outsourcing business
model, has recently hit a very bumpy patch along the road.
The companys problems are seen by some as comeuppance
for past arrogance and bravado, and by others as a cautionary
tale of the challenges of managing large outsourcing contracts,
especially in a depressed market.
In less than two months, EDS has endured a series of bad news
events that has fundamentally shaken the confidence of Wall
Street, and may also underscore the companys increasing
vulnerability to competitors for big outsourcing deals. The
companys woes also highlight some of the potential pitfalls
of the outsourcing business model itself.
Just two days before the autumnal equinox and eight days before
the close of its third quarter, the Big Fall officially took
place at EDS. The House That Ross Built announced it would
miss earnings estimates by an whopping 80%. Making matters
worse, the companys tough-talking CEO Dick Brown had
just painted a rosy picture for analysts a month earlier.
Talk about a credibility problem.
Needless to say, analyst and corporate debt ratings were downgraded
immediately. Shocked investors dumped the stock en masse,
resulting in a market valuation that was cut by more than
half in a single trading day. Calls for an investigation of
the companys accounting practices were heard up and
down Wall Street. Apparently the SEC did not require much
prodding, and an investigation is now underway.
Actual third quarter earnings were only slightly better than
the original profit warning, but even a tiny recovery in share
price could not mask the fact that EDS stock had lost over
70% of its value since the start of 2002.
The bad news hasnt ended with third quarter earnings
report, either. EDS, which prides itself on its ability to
close the really big outsourcing deals, has lost several high
profile bids in the past couple of weeks alone. Just a few
days ago, it was reported that J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
is nearing agreement with IBM on a seven-year technology outsourcing
contract that could be worth more than $5 billion. EDS had
also bid on the project. Less than a week earlier, consumer-goods
company Procter & Gamble Co. said it had backed out of
an $8 billion outsourcing deal it was negotiating with EDS.
Reportedly, EDS's financial difficulties are the reason behind
the P&G decision, and perhaps the J.P. Morgan move as
well. P&G is concerned that EDSs weakened financial
condition would make the company a risky partner to entrust
with the companys IT infrastructure jewels.
EDS is not only facing increased competition from IBM for
big outsourcing deals, of course. HP recently announced a
seven-year outsourcing deal with Canadian Imperial Bank of
Commerce worth about Cdn$2 billion. Thats the kind of
big-time contract that EDS has traditionally assumed as its
birthright.
According to a survey just released on November 18 by InformationWeek
Research, EDS is not faring well in the eyes of the very customers
it hopes to serve. Based on responses from 700 business-technology
professionals, the survey ranked leading outsourcing vendors
on such factors as trust, reliability, value, technical skills,
industry knowledge and innovation. EDS ranked sixth out of
nine vendors, only finishing ahead of IBM and its newly acquired
PricewaterhouseCoopers (numbers seven and eight respectively),
and last place Worldcom.
So what went wrong at EDS?
The companys official explanation is it was surprised
by a sudden and precipitous decline in discretionary spending
by its customers. But the problems at EDS also beg the question:
"What is discretionary and what isnt?" Certainly
the companys management consulting subsidiary, A.T.
Kearney, which it bought back in the mid-90s, has been in
a world of pain, along with the rest its industry, as corporations
pull back on consulting and new integration projects. But
some analysts now say that far more of the companys
outsourcing revenues are variable than the company actually
likes to think, or admit. In a stumbling economy, many of
EDSs customers are playing "Honey I Shrunk The
Outsourcing Deal," turning profitable relationships into
problems.
EDS has also been suffering from a bad case of indigestion
with some of its largest outsourcing contracts, particularly
a stalled outsourcing deal with the US Navy. The deal, reportedly
worth $7 billion, was signed in late1999 and still has not
turned a profit, in part because of delays due to software
testing ordered by Congress. EDS says the Navy contract and
another deal with the British Government cut cash flow by
$1.8 billion in the past 18 months.
Add to that some large bankruptcies among its outsourcing
clients, specifically WorldCom and US Airways Group, and youve
got the makings of a very large problem.
Sources close to the situation say that EDS is now scrambling
to right its ship by jettisoning people and costs wherever
possible. "Theyre looking closely at every outsourcing
relationship and deal and trying to figure out how to make
them profitable," according to one source. They are also
looking over many of their assets for possible sale to raise
cash. In fact, EDS announced on November 14 that it would
sell its Consumer Network Services unit to Fiserv, Inc. for
$320 million in order to meet upcoming pension costs.
According to some employees, EDS has been going through a
"zero-based" employee valuation program in which
every staff member needs to defend his or her job and the
value it produces for the company. A couple of weeks ago,
the company announced it would cut 3% to 4% of its workforce
over the next several quarters.
Analysts are harshest towards Brown because they feel he waited
far too long to come clean. "There was a time when he
could have lowered his guidance, but he maintained it wasnt
happening to EDS," said one analyst. "There is a
pretty big credibility chasm here," said another.
For EDS, it has been a very stormy fall. Among financial analysts,
what winter will bring is wide open to speculation.
|